Post by Dan PidcockI had a look at translating your FAQ once and did the first section
but got no reply from you.
I'm *very* sure that I wrote a reply. If you've never received one then
I'm sorry and I have no idea what happend.
Post by Dan PidcockHowever what this revealed to me was that IMO many of the questions in
there are not frequently asked questions on the newsgroups.
For example?
The FAQ mainly contains questions I found in newsgroups (alt.os.beos,
comp.sys.be.*, de.comp.os.be), several web forums (eg.
thegreenboard.com, or beosonline.de), some stuff I found in the other
FAQ, and a few problems I came across (eg. that MediaPlayer refuses to
play files with a '@' in the name) or I thought that might be
interesting.
In some cases it's hard for a newbie to ask the correct question because
he/she doesn't know what options there are. I tried to give them some of
the options from the start.
Post by Dan PidcockAlso much of the answers in there are best answered by pointing to web
resources such as bebits wiki, betips.
Basically yes, but first of all there is the problem that those
resources often only exist in one language (I know that there are German
translations of the BeTips because I did some of those myself), and it
would be easier if both language versions of a FAQ aren't too different
from each other.
Also who can guarantee that those resources are there to stay? (OK, if
BeBits were gone then BeOS would be probably dead anyway...)
It took me really several hours to find all the articles on BeTips
again, after Scot Hacker changed it from TrackerDB to PHP (I think the
internal integrity of BeTips is still broken, because links from one
article to another simply don't work anymore). When Scot handed BeTips
over to someone else the suddenly my deep links to certain articles
didn't work anymore and you ended up at the title page. I think that is
fixed now, but those things often made me think: Wouldn't it be better
if I at least had the most important stuff on my FAQ so I'm not that
dependend on other sites working correctly?
Post by Dan PidcockI think the way to go about this would be to write an FAQ from scratch
looking through the newsgroups to see what are the actual FAQs.
If you think it's the best way to do it then go ahead and do it.
I know that I have to do a complete rewrite of the FAQ to get it
up-to-date again, but I certainly wouldn't write it from scratch! I
don't think it's that bad, apart from the Network section which is so
bad due to the lack of practical experience on my part (One of my more
or less rigid rules: Only include what you can confirm yourself or what
enough people confirmed that you are sure it works.).
Some stuff is hard to fit in there because of the stucture I chose, but
I want to keep that structure because I think it's necessary (take a
look at the other FAQs and tell me where you find things faster).
I already did a rewrite of the intro to get the current status of BeOS
right. I still cannot decide if I want to mention stuff like BONE, Dano,
or the Developer and MAX Editions. If I mentioned them I had to state
why I don't want to support them and that might be quite a long
paragraph, not to mention probably a rude one...
Post by Dan PidcockThere is so little activity now that it hardly seems worth it though.
Sometimes I'm glad that I don't have any web statistics for the BeOS
FAQ, because I think then I'd notice that I did all the work for
nothing...
--
M.I.K.e
(The crownless again shall be King.)
Deutsche BeOS FAQ: <http://www.be-faq.de/>